Returns a method-level integrity scorecard for all ACCU methods.
Columns include integrity_tier (high / standard / contested),
chubb_affected (whether the Chubb 2022 Independent Review
flagged the method), chubb_recommendation_applies (whether a
specific Chubb recommendation targets the method), and
federal_register_instrument (authoritative legislative
instrument ID).
Details
Use this to filter or weight ACCU aggregates, or to annotate a
chart with integrity context. For example, an analyst reporting
"185 million ACCUs issued to date" should, at minimum, break
the total down by integrity_tier and flag the contested share.
References
Chubb, I. (2022). Independent Review of Australian Carbon Credit Units. Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water.
Macintosh, A., Butler, D., Larraondo, P., Evans, M.C., Ansell, D., Gibbons, P., Lindenmayer, D., Waschka, M. and Fisher, R. (2022). "The emperor's new clothes: assessing the integrity of ACCUs." Australian National University working paper series.
Butler, D., Macintosh, A. and Pouliot, M. (2023). "Response to the Chubb Review." Australian National University.
Ansell, D. et al. (2020). "Contemporary fire regimes of northern Australia: a review of current patterns, impacts and challenges." Environmental Research Reviews.