Skip to contents

Returns a method-level integrity scorecard for all ACCU methods. Columns include integrity_tier (high / standard / contested), chubb_affected (whether the Chubb 2022 Independent Review flagged the method), chubb_recommendation_applies (whether a specific Chubb recommendation targets the method), and federal_register_instrument (authoritative legislative instrument ID).

Usage

cer_method_integrity(tier = NULL, status = NULL)

Arguments

tier

Optional filter on integrity_tier. One or more of "high", "standard", "contested".

status

Optional filter on method status. One or more of "active", "suspended", "under_review", "superseded", "expired".

Value

A cer_tbl with one row per method (19 rows at v0.2.0).

Details

Use this to filter or weight ACCU aggregates, or to annotate a chart with integrity context. For example, an analyst reporting "185 million ACCUs issued to date" should, at minimum, break the total down by integrity_tier and flag the contested share.

References

Chubb, I. (2022). Independent Review of Australian Carbon Credit Units. Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water.

Macintosh, A., Butler, D., Larraondo, P., Evans, M.C., Ansell, D., Gibbons, P., Lindenmayer, D., Waschka, M. and Fisher, R. (2022). "The emperor's new clothes: assessing the integrity of ACCUs." Australian National University working paper series.

Butler, D., Macintosh, A. and Pouliot, M. (2023). "Response to the Chubb Review." Australian National University.

Ansell, D. et al. (2020). "Contemporary fire regimes of northern Australia: a review of current patterns, impacts and challenges." Environmental Research Reviews.

Examples

cer_method_integrity()
cer_method_integrity(tier = "contested")
cer_method_integrity(status = "active")